Skip to content

MoM Executes Manufacturing

Products-First Overview to Opcenter

This page is your products-first guide to Siemens Opcenter’s MoM family: MES for compliant execution and traceability, APS for finite capacity planning & detailed scheduling, and Insights Hub for industrial IoT, OEE, asset health, and energy visibility. We show what each product does, when to use it, and how to combine them into a closed loop—plan → execute → sense → improve. We reference neutral standards and research (ISA95 for architecture; ISO 22400 for KPIs; FDA Part 11 for erecords; NIST OT security) so technical and compliance teams have confidence (ISA, 2000; ISO, 2014; FDA, 2003; NIST, 2023). Downloads below give you deeper product primers and industry briefs. 

Untitled-13-02-1
Untitled-13-03

MoM Defined

What is Opcenter MoM? 

Manufacturing Operations Management (MoM) coordinates people, processes, and systems at Level 3 of the ISA95 model so production runs to plan, proves compliance, and improves continuously. In the Siemens stack, MoM is typically delivered with three product pillars: 
  • Opcenter MES (Execution): paperless execution, e-signatures, complete genealogy, inprocess quality, deviation management, integration to ERP/QMS/PLM. 
  • Insights Hub (Industrial IoT): a cloud environment to collect and normalize machine/process data and expose OEE, asset health, and energy/sustainability metrics across lines and sites. 
Why these matter together: MES ensures the work is done the right way; APS ensures the plan is feasible; Insights Hub ensures decisions use live signals. The trio aligns the plan, the work, and the improvement cycle (ISA, 2000); (ISO, 2014). 

Learn More

Why Factories Need it

Opcenter MES 

Opcenter APS

Insights Hub

What it does 

Opcenter MES turns orders and specifications into repeatable, auditable execution. It captures who did what, when, with which materials/equipment and enforces in-process quality. In regulated environments, MES underpins eDHR/eBR with electronic signatures and audit trails aligned to 21 CFR Part 11 (FDA, 2003). 

Core capabilities 
  • eDHR / eBR: electronic records with review/approval workflows and tamper-evident logs (FDA, 2003). 
  • Traceability & genealogy: component/lot/batch/device history plus equipment parameters by design. 
  • In-process quality: checks, SPC triggers, NC/CAPA hand-offs, and review-by-exception. 
  • Digital work instructions: versioned instructions tied to training/qualification. 
  • Equipment & test integration: historian/PLC/SCADA/test/vision capture to remove rekeying. 
  • Enterprise integration: orders, BOMs/specs, and changes synchronized with ERP/QMS/PLM and aligned to ISA95 object/activity models (ISA, 2000). 
Fit & value 

Choose MES when you need proof (audits, customer claims),  consistency (reduced human error), and  speed (fewer release delays). Teams see faster deviation resolution and fewer data-entry mistakes when data is captured at source and approvals are in process, not after the fact (FDA, 2003). 

What it does

APS creates finite capacity plans and executable schedules that reflect your real constraints. It provides what-if scenarios, rule/heuristic selection, and KPI-driven trade-offs so Sales promises match Operations reality (Pinedo, 2022). 

Core capabilities 
  • Constraint modeling: skills/crews, sequence-dependent changeovers, cleanroom policies, parallel/alternate routing, reentrant flows, and wafer/lot rules. 
  • Optimization & scenarios: dispatching rules, metaheuristics, and compare scenarios by OTIF, flow time, WIP, or setup minutes (Pinedo, 2022). 
  • Closed-loop updates: reschedule with live shop floor signals to recover faster from variability (Fernandez Viagas, Ruiz, & Mula, 2022). 
Fit & value 

Choose APS when you face  due-date pain, expediting, or  shared bottlenecks across lines. Research shows that schedules that incorporate fresh information and constraint modeling outperform static, infinite capacity plans in high-mix environments (Fernandez-Viagas et al., 2022). 

What it does 

Insights Hub aggregates machine/process signals and standardizes OEE and asset/energy metrics across plants for faster decisions. It complements MES and APS by surfacing losses, anomalies, and energy waste with drilldowns to product, asset, line, and shift ((ISO, 2014)). 

Core capabilities 
  • OEE per ISO 22400: standard definitions for availability, performance, quality—with loss tree views you can act on (ISO, 2014). 
  • Asset health: thresholds and rule-based alerts (temperature, vibration, power) routed to the right roles. 
  • Energy & sustainability: trend and benchmark energy use to target the highest-impact improvements. 
Fit & value 

Choose Insights Hub when you need cross-plant visibility fast. Start with one line/site to baseline OEE and top losses; then widen coverage. Use these signals to focus APS rules and MES checks where they’ll pay back most (ISO, 2014). 

From Features to Impact

Feature → Outcome map (quick scan) 

See how each capability translates into measurable results across MES, APS, and Insights Hub.

Capability

Product

Outcome

Untitled-13-04

When to lead with which product

Start with MES

when compliance risk and traceability dominate (eDHR/eBR, audit trails, review-by-exception). 

Start with APS

when the business struggles with due dates and firefights around shared bottlenecks. 

Start with Insights Hub
when leaders lack a single visibility baseline for OEE/asset/energy and want to target the biggest losses. 
In practice, many plants begin with one thin slice (e.g., one product family/line/site) and build out in quarterly increments (Deloitte, 2025).

Architecture & Security

(standards aligned)
Untitled-13-20
ISA95 model first

map products / materials / equipment / personnel and events so ERP/QMS/PLM and Level2/1 controls speak the same language (ISA, 2000). 

Untitled-13-21
OT security

segment and monitor OT networks, enforce least privilege, and document backup/DR per NIST SP 80082r3 (NIST, 2023). 

Untitled-13-22
KPIs that travel

define OEE and other MoM KPIs with ISO 22400 so dashboards and reviews don’t drift (ISO, 2014). 

Implementation path

Timeframes vary with scope, data readiness, and validation complexity. Regulated environments should align records/signatures and testing with FDA Part 11 guidance (FDA, 2003).
NEW

From Theory to Practice

Execute Knowledge Topic

Explore a curated library of essential manufacturing topics. Each entry includes a concise 200-word overview for quick learning and an in-depth 800-word article for deeper insights into standards, systems, and best practices.

 

What is MoM?

A plainEnglish guide to MoM and how MES, APS, and IIoT fit together (Level 3 focus). 

Read More

MES vs. ERP vs. QMS

Who owns which records and approvals—and how they sync using ISA95 models. 

Read More

APS vs. MRP


Why finite capacity planning beats infinite assumptions for OTIF. 


Read More

Modeling changeovers & cleanroom rules

Scheduling realities that move OTIF without buying more machines. 

Read More

eDHR & 21 CFR Part 11


What “compliance ready” means for signatures and audit trails. 

Read More

OEE per ISO 22400

Standardize loss analysis so improvements compare across plants. 

Read More

Opcenter + SAP integration

Master data alignment and error handling that keep orders flowing. 

Read More

Security for OT systems

Practical protections for MES/APS/IIoT without slowing the line. 

Read More

Frequently Asked Questions

References

Deloitte. (2025, May 1). 2025 Smart Manufacturing and Operations Survey. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/manufacturing/2025-smart-manufacturing-survey.html
This report is a useful benchmark for the current state of smart‑manufacturing adoption, budgets, and the obstacles that slow scaling. It analyzes responses from 600 U.S. manufacturing leaders on investment focus, data readiness, talent, and value realization. Two takeaways stand out: investment is rising while skills and data quality remain gating factors, and small, quick‑win pilots that scale consistently outperform big‑bang transformations.

Fernandez‑Viagas, V., Ruiz, R., & Mula, J. (2022). Exploring the benefits of scheduling with advanced and real‑time information integration in Industry 4.0: A computational study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 171, 108424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108424
This paper provides empirical evidence for why constraint‑aware, information‑rich scheduling improves operations performance. The authors run computational experiments that compare static scheduling against approaches that incorporate real‑time shop‑floor signals under variability. The key lessons are that schedules benefiting from fresh information clearly outperform static plans, and that explicit constraint modeling is decisive in high‑mix environments.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2003). Guidance for Industry—Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures—Scope and Application. https://www.fda.gov/media/75414/download
This guidance is foundational for any MES implementation that relies on electronic records and signatures in regulated manufacturing. It clarifies the scope and application of 21 CFR Part 11 and sets expectations for risk‑based validation, audit trails, and security controls. The practical implications are to align validation effort to risk and to guarantee integrity and traceability for all regulated e‑records and signatures.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2014). ISO 22400‑2:2014—Key performance indicators for manufacturing operations management—Part 2: Definitions and descriptions. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/54497/10e33d2a34c144558b5e3024ee5e1cb0/ISO-22400-2-2014.pdf
ISO 22400 establishes a standard KPI vocabulary—especially for OEE—that keeps plant‑to‑plant comparisons honest. Part 2 provides precise definitions for availability, performance, quality, and related MoM indicators with examples. The practical guidance is to adopt these definitions to prevent KPI drift and to structure loss trees so improvements are comparable across sites.

International Society of Automation (ISA). (2000). ANSI/ISA‑95.00.01—Enterprise‑Control System Integration Part 1: Models and Terminology. https://webstore.ansi.org/preview-pages/ISA/preview_ISA%2B95.00.01-2000.pdf
ISA‑95 supplies the common language and layered architecture that lets enterprise systems and manufacturing operations integrate with lower risk. Part 1 defines the core models, objects, and terminology used to map products, materials, equipment, personnel, and events across Levels 3–4. Two enduring insights are that shared models cut integration rework and that consistent terminology accelerates delivery across MES, APS, and IIoT.

McKinsey & Company. (2025, March 11). Powering productivity: Operations insights for 2025. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/powering-productivity-operations-insights-for-2025
This research summarizes where operations leaders are actually capturing value and why some transformations sustain results. It synthesizes survey and case evidence on workflow redesign, governance, and capability building across industries. Two implications for MoM programs are that leadership accountability and ongoing skills development drive durable outcomes, and that live data shortens the path from detection to decision.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2023). SP 800‑82 Rev. 3—Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security. https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/82/r3/final
NIST 800‑82r3 is the definitive playbook for securing industrial control and OT environments that host MES/APS/IIoT. It covers threats, reference architectures, segmentation/monitoring strategies, and contingency planning tailored to OT. Two immediate actions follow: treat OT distinctly from IT with defense‑in‑depth, and design recovery (backups/DR) without sacrificing safety and availability.

Pinedo, M. L. (2022). Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems (6th ed.). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-08521-8
Pinedo’s text is the authoritative foundation behind APS and constraint‑aware scheduling used in modern MoM stacks. The book spans single‑machine problems through job‑shop and re‑entrant flows, detailing heuristics, algorithms, and system design trade‑offs. Two core lessons are that constraint‑aware methods beat naive dispatch rules under variability and that implementation detail and data quality matter as much as the algorithm choice.