Skip to content

HOME / AGENTS

Connected Manufacturing Agents

Governed AI Agents for Regulated Manufacturing

Secure data. Role-based access. Human-in-the-loop by design.

Connected Manufacturing Agents help regulated manufacturers move from scattered data to coordinated action. Agents monitor signals, investigate issues, gather evidence, recommend next steps, and escalate decisions to qualified humans across quality, yield, maintenance, downtime, and root cause workflows.

They are designed around secure customer data access, role-based permissions, auditability, and Annex 22-aligned human-in-the-loop.
Governed agent layer visual

Annex 22-Aligned Human-in-the-Loop

Agents gather evidence, explain recommendations, and route decisions to qualified humans. In regulated workflows, agents assist decision-making; humans remain accountable.
Read Annex 22 and AI Agents

The Category

Regulated manufacturers need governed agents, not generic autonomy.

Generic AI agents are not enough for manufacturing environments where decisions affect quality, compliance, uptime, yield, customer commitments, and audit readiness.

Connected Manufacturing Agents are built for practical plant workflows with defined roles, approved data sources, permission-aware access, evidence trails, escalation rules, and human review points.

Design Partner Program

Join our 90-Day Design Partner Program.

We are inviting a small group of qualified manufacturers to help shape the first generation of Connected Manufacturing Agents.

Design partners work with us on one focused, high-value use case such as quality investigation, root cause analysis, yield loss, downtime, maintenance intelligence, or compliance evidence gathering.

This is not an open-ended AI experiment. It is a 90-day, thin-slice program built around a defined workflow, approved data sources, role-based access, human review checkpoints, and measurable value.
Talk to Us About Fit

From Conversational AI to the Agentic Application

Conversational AI answers questions. Agents coordinate governed action.

Conversational AI helps teams ask natural-language questions across manufacturing systems. Agents go further. They monitor signals, investigate related events, gather evidence, recommend next steps, and escalate decisions to qualified people.

For regulated industries, that difference matters. The agent is not just producing an answer. It is helping coordinate a workflow across quality, production, maintenance, engineering, compliance, and management while respecting data access and human review requirements.
Read Siemens Opcenter and Conversational AI

Conversational AI

  • Ask questions in plain English
  • Retrieve data across systems
  • Return answers, charts, and summaries
  • Reduce reporting and dashboard delays
  • Help teams understand what happened
Read Siemens Opcenter and Conversational AI
Read Governed AI in Manufacturing

Governed Agentic Application

  • Monitor changing conditions
  • Investigate causes across systems
  • Gather and preserve evidence
  • Respect role-based access controls
  • Recommend next-best actions
  • Escalate decisions to qualified humans
  • Support auditability and review
Read Governed AI in Manufacturing

Secure data. Role-based access. Human-in-the-loop by design.

Closed-Loop Orchestration

Agents work across Design, Execute, Measure, and Improve.

Agents are not a fifth step after Improve. They are the orchestration layer across the closed loop.

They help move work from signal to evidence, from evidence to recommendation, and from recommendation to governed human action.
Governed Agent Layer: Design Design icon Execute Execute icon Measure Measure icon Improve Improve icon Monitor Investigate Correlate Recommend-or-Escalate Review
Every step is governed by secure data access,
role-based permissions, and human review.

Governed routines

Turn a useful investigation into a governed, repeatable routine.

Connected Manufacturing provides one governed agentic application—not a collection of named digital workers.

Authorized users ask focused manufacturing questions across approved systems and documents. The application returns a source-backed answer with evidence, context, and recommended next checks.

When an analysis is useful, the user can save it as a governed routine, run it again when needed, schedule it, share it with authorized colleagues, and monitor its results through alerts, approvals, and review queues.

The same application can support routines across quality, yield, maintenance, downtime, operations, and root cause analysis.

Example Routine 1

Quality Evidence Review

Purpose

Help a quality team identify rising defect patterns and prepare the evidence needed for human review.

Example question

“What defects increased in the last 24 hours, which lots were affected, and what changed before the increase?”

What the application prepares

  • Ranked defect changes by line, product, lot, shift, and time window
  • Inspection and nonconformance records
  • Related maintenance, process, supplier, and downtime signals
  • Missing, stale, or conflicting evidence
  • Recommended containment or inspection checks

Save as a routine

The quality engineer can save the successful analysis to run each shift, each day, or when a defined threshold is reached.

Governance model

The routine uses approved data sources and role-based access. A qualified quality owner reviews the evidence and remains responsible for containment, disposition, deviation, or escalation decisions.

Read AI Agents for Quality Management

Example Routine 2

Cross-System Root Cause Investigation

Purpose

Help a cross-functional team assemble evidence and develop testable root-cause hypotheses.

Example question

“Investigate the defect spike on Line 3 and show what changed across quality, yield, maintenance, downtime, and supplier data.”

What the application prepares

  • A timeline of relevant events and changes
  • Quality, yield, maintenance, tooling, downtime, and supplier evidence
  • Ranked hypotheses with supporting and conflicting evidence
  • Open questions and missing records
  • Recommended validation steps and responsible functions

Save and share as a routine

The user can save the investigation pattern and share it with authorized quality, operations, maintenance, or engineering colleagues. The routine can then be reused for similar events without recreating the analysis from scratch.

Governance model

The application prepares evidence and recommendations. Qualified people determine the root cause, approve corrective actions, and remain responsible for regulated and operational decisions.

Read AI Root Cause Analysis in Manufacturing

Governed repeatability

Routine Lifecycle

Read Designing a Governed Manufacturing Agent Workflow
  1. Ask

    Ask a bounded manufacturing question.

  2. Answer

    Receive a visual, interpretation, and linked supporting evidence.

  3. Save

    Save useful work as a governed, repeatable routine.

  4. Run

    Execute the routine on demand or on an approved schedule.

  5. Share

    Make the routine available to authorized users and roles.

  6. Monitor

    Receive results, alerts, exceptions, and approval requests.

  7. Review

    Use the output within existing human-owned operational and regulated processes.

Operating principle

Self-service routine creation.

Governed application execution.

Human-owned decisions.

Governance

Governed means secure data, role-based access, and human accountability.

In regulated manufacturing, governance cannot be an afterthought. Connected Manufacturing Agents are designed so agent workflows respect customer data boundaries, enforce role-based access, and keep qualified humans accountable for regulated decisions.

Agents assist the work. They do not silently replace human judgment in regulated workflows.

90-Day Design Partner Program

Help shape governed manufacturing agents around a real operating constraint.

We are recruiting design partners for a focused 90-day program.

The program is designed for manufacturers that want to explore governed agents using real workflows, real systems, secure data access, role-based permissions, human review, and measurable business outcomes.

The right first use case is usually narrow and valuable: one recurring defect family, one downtime pattern, one yield issue, one root-cause workflow, or one compliance evidence bottleneck.

Who should apply

Good fit

  • Regulated or quality-sensitive manufacturer
  • Clear operating pain in quality, yield, maintenance, downtime, root cause, or compliance evidence
  • Access to relevant system data
  • Business owner willing to participate
  • Need for governed AI, not uncontrolled automation
  • Ability to support a 90-day pilot
  • Willingness to define human review and accountability

Not the right fit yet

  • No clear use case
  • No access to source system data
  • Looking for fully autonomous decision-making
  • No internal owner for review and adoption
  • Not ready to evaluate value within 90 days
  • No ability to define access permissions or review roles

Design Partner Program

Apply for the 90-Day Design Partner Program

Tell us where a governed manufacturing agent could create value in your operation.
We will review fit and follow up with qualified companies.
Current systems
Current governance / security requirements
We review each submission for fit and follow up with qualified companies.

Thank you for your interest in the Connected Manufacturing 90-Day Design Partner Program.

We will review your use case, systems, and governance requirements and follow up if there is a strong fit.

Ready to explore governed agents for your manufacturing workflow?

Join our 90-Day Design Partner Program and help shape practical, secure, human-supervised agents for regulated manufacturing operations.